Understanding the Perfect Punishment
There's a subbie I'm teasing long-distance... She can't get enough. She loves feeling so controlled and desperate. She rarely acts out, but I often threaten her with punishment just as a warning to give her best and put everything she's got into it. There's a great punishment I threaten her with that never fails to push herself into a subspace where she gives her all for me.
Spanking? She loves spankings! Further, she's submissive; she needs to please and serve. Experiencing a spanking as punishment would change the whole tone, the whole context, to something sad. If I think the idea of spanking her is hot, and if the idea of her being eager for it is hot for both of us, why would I want to taint spankings by associating that with punishment in her memory?
Denial? The aching, the pulsing, the wetness, the constant struggle to not squirm in her chair during the day... that's what she craves. That is what she gets for being such an obedient slut for me. Great, mind-crashing orgasms isn't the goal, denial is. Being teased to the point where she's begging, breathless, sometimes even in tears, is why she sought me out. This isn't punishment, this is the reward.
Pain? As I see it there are three 'levels' of pain in (my concept of) a healthy D/s relationship...
- The mildest is merely 'intense stimulation' that is pleasurable.
- The middle is pain that's so intense that it's not enjoyable but is endured for the dominant. Doing this well can bring us both closer, and is good for deepening her discipline and bring out her subbie nature, but it's still a "good thing" that I won't want associated with my displeasure.
- The third level of pain gets into "consensual non-consent". I'd be willing to start going there with her but, long distance, the risks skyrocket both in probability and impact: Even if I were to cause pain through hypnosis instead of real stimuli, chances that the submissive might go to a bad mental space rise, and long distance aftercare doesn't work well enough.
No, instead, I threaten her with orgasms. One per day for a week. It's not orgasm denial, it's a much more insidious form of denial - denial of that hot, tense, needy feeling that she craves to live and breathe. The idea of doing it doesn't arouse her (a sign of a great punishment), nor does it arouse me (another sign of a great punishment), but the reason she gets so aroused when I threaten her with it is that it proves, more than anything else, that I've got her number and I know it's the perfect punishment. Anyone not into teasing and denial would think this is a silly punishment, and her reaction to the threat inescapably reinforces that she's a true denial slut. It connects us... it proves that I understand this side of her much more than she's comfortable with and that not only have I got her by the clit, I've also got her by the part of her brain that keeps dragging her down the rabbit hole, taunting that part of her with the keys to getting out to run and play, a dog owner holding a leash & frisbee and asking "Do you want to go outside?"
Do you?
- subtease2's blog
- Login or register to post comments

Comments
wow
Reading this and getting wet just imagining being in her shoes!!!
you got her number alright, and maybe that of a few others of us. Mind you, i do enjoy a good orgasm now and then...
*grins *
Variations on a theme.
If you are going to have her orgasm for a week, do a daily increment. First day one orgasm. Second day two. Repeat until seven daily orgasms at the end of the week. At which time the transition back to denial should quite intense.
Ooooo!! :-)
VERY nice idea, Davo! Thank you!
But...
That has a side effect of enablement, of preparation for something her what she wants, and I find it quite hot, too...
Which means that wouldn't be as good for punishment...
But "just because"? Just because I know there'd be this wonderful, sinister feedback loop where she'd be aching to ache, then remembering that this is building up to something, only to have that heat stolen by the next orgasm, ratcheting tighter until...?
I wonder...
After fueling/creating a little masturbation addiction, what would be more effective after that week: No-touch, or touch-edge (touching allowed but if you do you MUST edge)?
This isn't about fun or discipline any more. This is For Science(TM). :-P. Multiple studies required. Any volunteers? LOL. We could check in via chat as a group over the week, and I'd randomly assign what happens the following week. Then maybe even repeating the study?
But how to quantify the desperation?
Thanks Davo! The best ideas are the ones that lead to more.
Puppy and I did something
Puppy and I did something similar to this after she passed the two month mark for the first time. I let her have free reign for a week, but she had to orgasm one more time then the last time she had one. So if she came once, she'd have orgasm twice before she could stop, and so on. She had to call in on Thursday.
After the week I put her on lock down and the only hands allowed to play with my toys were mine.
By the third day I woke up to her hands locked on my wrists gripping *my* hand in her panties. So I'd say it's pretty effective as a way to get them riled up, but as for a punishment... Honestly, I've not really *found* one that stays a punishment for long with Puppy.
Hell, she's even gotten wet standing in a corner holding a dime to the wall with her nose. Yes, she's reading this over my shoulder and fidgeting. -Wicked smirk-
Science
"But how to quantify the desperation?"
1) Subjective self report using a 5 or 10 point scale.
2) Researchers' objective observations for specific behavioral and physiologic signs of arousal, also using a scoring rubric to allow for proper quantitative analysis.